Friday, July 1, 2022

Five Years On; Anime Feminist Vs Japanese Pop Culture

Well, as you can see, not a great deal of writing is getting done for this blog. To be honest, I have put the blog on hold for a while for various reasons. I still want to complete my series on Japanese cinema from 1989 and my long-planned series on the anime films of Japanese cult Kofuku-no-Kagaku (Happy Science), plus a number of other articles I have done initial research and planning on. Instead, here is an article I wrote on and off for a couple of years, then abandoned. When Anime Feminist had its fifth anniversary in late 2021, I decided to rewrite it. This mostly took place from December. I wrote about half of it, then abandon it again, only to recommence and abandon it, on and off until I finally finished it in April, when I sat on it and initially decided not to publish it. After a lot of thought, I have decided to put it up on my blog. I know it’s rather long, but it sort of turned out that way as I complied my issues with the website.

To explain, I originally wrote a piece criticising the website Anime Feminist (Anifem) and its creator Amelia Cook back in 2016 some months after it launched. My main issue with the writing and the website itself was that it failed to understand Japanese pop culture as a whole and bizarrely viewed it through a weird myopic western feminist lens. I felt it was a really bad approach and applying western feminist dogma was very unhelpful in understanding something which had its own unique evolution, visual grammar, stylistic devices and even genres. Even worse was the deliberate misinterpretation of the material and to a large degree demonisation of specific sub-fandoms. I was also extremely cynical of Cook’s motivations for creating the website. I suspected that she saw Anita Sarkeesian’s Feminist Frequency website and wanted to make something similar in order to beef up her resume or to gain a higher profile.

Apparent Anifem critic as perceived by the site's staff
I doubted her sincerity of being an anime and manga fan and felt that the thing she proclaimed to love was just going to be collateral damage in order to reach whatever goal she was aiming for. But at the same time, I also felt that the vast majority of the criticism levelled at Anifem was poorly articulated and of very little value. Most of it was extremely anti-feminist, felt quite misogynistic and used the language of the far right, despite the protests of those who used such language, who mocked others when this was pointed out to them.

A lot of water has passed under the bridge since the website was launched. The site’s creator, Amelia Cook, deregistered the site as a business in the UK sometime in 2018 and left the website in 2019 after experiencing burnout. Just over a year ago, both her twitter accounts went silent. Caitlin Moore, Dee and Vrai Kaiser became the website’s managing editors in 2019. Another thing I’ve noticed was the initial support in the first two years of the website’s inception, mostly from many well-known people in the anime community, bafflingly seemed to practically evaporate soon after. Regardless of how well written or thought provoking an article might be, very little of the material published seems to make it out beyond their small core of supporters.

Anifem's dog whistling paying dividends 
And because of that, I have one question I am grappling with in writing this article; is there any point in criticising their work? Well, considering that some core staff on the site have branched out to writing for more mainstream websites such as Anime News Network and have hauled their ideological baggage with them, I would say yes. Because there has been a lack of decent criticism written about the website, I would say yes. Because criticising and judging pop culture based on an ideology, and limiting your own entertainment choices to those that only fit your own impossible to achieve personal values is quite unhealthy, I would say yes, there is a point in criticising their work.

To begin with, I have to admit there has been some excellent articles published since I last wrote about the site, notably to do with anime and manga for women in general, as well as genres within those two types of media that women would enjoy (with most of these written by outside contributors). However, much of the material published is mostly in the form of negative criticism of Japanese pop culture. And while that I agree that Japanese pop culture should not be free of scrutiny and criticism, when the vast majority of material published is negative or at least contains some negative elements within it, I sort of find myself questioning if the core staff of Anifem actually enjoy anime or other Japanese pop culture at all.

Winning hearts and minds yet again
Part of this constant negativity seems to centre on a focus on a small number of franchises and one genre; shonen manga, specifically those which appear in Shonen Jump. For example, Anifem commissioned at least six “Kill la Kill” full length articles, with search results yielding over 30 pages of results for the series. For a show that possibly sits within the seinen demographic and had finished broadcasting two years before Anifem's site went live, that’s a lot of mentions. Anifem’s bête noire, “Darling in the Franxx”, has seven full length articles and over 30 mentions on the website. This is despite writers like Caitlin Moore claiming they don’t think about or want to write about shows they despise. Clearly that’s untrue on both counts. And it’s the same story for other articles exploring issues tied to racism, sexism and other topics; they barely stray outside the realm of a few titles, again mostly those published in Shonen Jump, with “My Hero Academia” appearing quite frequently, shoehorned in as an example, regardless of the topic at hand.

I recall one reader complaining about the number of articles dedicated to “Darling in the Franxx” versus material their readers would actually like. Vrai Kaiser responded by saying they didn’t set out to do that and it was untrue. But the reader fired back by noting there were more search hits for “Darling in the Franxx” than there were for Yaoi. And this is a more than a fair argument. You have to question why so little time and energy is dedicated to exposing their readers to material they may like. Apart from one single article on shoujo manga from the 1970’s and a couple of articles on Yuri and Yaoi, few classics of the genre, mangaka or female anime directors are rarely mentioned, let alone given full length articles.

Murasaki Yamada
For example, inputting Riyoko Ikeda into the site’s search bar literally brings up ten hits. One of the most popular shoujo mangaka ever, ten mentions in total. Let that sink in. Other female mangaka, even popular ones like Rumiko Takahashi, feature less prominently at times. The same goes for female anime directors and other creators. While Sayo Yamamoto was interviewed and a couple of her titles given feature articles, few other directors or creative staff are even mentioned on the site, let alone given feature articles. For example, Naoko Yamada is really only mentioned once in a full-length article in the last five years. In fact, there are far more links to outside articles than there are ones written for Anifem. Even worse, instead of celebrating and highlighting the new wave of highly regarded and influential female directors and talent over the last decade and a half in the anime industry, they decided to dwell on the negative with an article entitled “Anime’s Glass Ceiling: what keeps women out of the director’s chair?”.

Even when the material they are critiquing offers up excellent avenues to explore the talented women in the industry and the history of women in fandom, they seem to be either totally ignorant of it or deliberately avoiding highlighting them. For example, a podcast episode of theirs explores the movie “Miss Hokusai (Sarusuberi)”, but bafflingly only mentions the author of the original manga, female mangaka Hinako Sugiura, in passing. They either seem ignorant or utterly uninterested in Sugiura’s history, including the fact she was initially an assistant to prominent feminist mangaka Murasaki Yamada. Considering that the website is called “Anime Feminist”, I found this omission rather curious. Reviews of currently airing anime include most shows streaming on Crunchyroll and other streaming services, including shows their readers would clearly not be interested in. Meanwhile shows which did not fit their myopic review criteria, like “Little Witch Academia”, were ignored because Netflix wasn’t streaming it weekly like most simulcasts. This is despite the fact it clearly was in line with what their viewers enjoyed. “Little Witch Academia” was eventually the subject of their podcast, but that is literally the only time the series has been mentioned.

Kyoto Animation main studio
It’s the same with events in the media. When the Kyoto Animation arson attack occurred three years ago, there was a massive outpouring of sadness and empathy from anime fandom. However, none of the key staff tweeted or even retweeted anything at all about the incident for days afterward. Instead, all we got was a quickly written post three days later which was titled “What does KyoAni mean to you?”, which literally comprised of one sentence about the incident, and posed questions to the readers like what their favourite anime from the studio was. No feature articles about the studio were forthcoming. This was quite odd as Kyoto Animation is extremely female positive in its employment practices such as hiring more women than most studios, promoting them to higher roles such as director, have far better working conditions than the industry standard such as salaried roles, restrictions on overtime and a generous maternity leave policy.

I also question their comprehension of complex issues and wonder if they only understand them beyond having a superficial knowledge of them. For example, when they decided not to review “The Rising of the Shield Hero” as they felt the show had themes of rape and slavery apologism, they instead they posted a list of Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) that dealt with stamping out modern-day slavery and gave assistance to survivors of rape and abuse. That’s all fine and dandy, but they managed to fuck it up big time by initially including the Polaris Project, an anti-sex worker, religious right NGO that most certainly highly inflates their statistics in terms of human trafficking. Readers were rightly outraged by this, and although Anifem apologised and took down the link to the NGO, they still kept the link to the National Human Trafficking Hotline, which is run entirely by the Polaris Project. How they didn’t know that is beyond my comprehension. Polaris’ logo is displayed prominently at the bottom of the website.

After the Rain
But one of the major issues I have with the website is that many articles blatantly ignore large sections of storylines, plots or characters in order for the author to force fit a narrative, their own biases or ideology. For instance, an article comparing the age gap romances in “Ristorante Paradiso” and “After the Rain” is utterly dishonest about the latter’s content. The show is essentially a very bittersweet tale of two people regaining their dreams and purpose back. More importantly the romance is very one sided; the middle-aged male restaurant manager, Kondo, from the get go rejects Akira’s (the highschooler who works as waitstaff) advances and does not pursue a relationship with her at all. However, you would not assume that from the article. It blatantly misrepresents both lead characters feelings, their work relationship and doesn't seem to understand how an employee would greet their boss in a Japanese setting.

Now I'm all for discourse on titles which may have the potential to be controversial, like “After the Rain”. But the article takes key scenes out of context and deliberately misrepresented what happens. A laundry list of scenes the author had issue with, which includes links to screenshots, are far, far tamer or totally mismatched to their rather salacious descriptions. Many were taken completely out of context. It is quite apparent that the show is heavily influenced by shoujo manga, even though the original work was published in a seinen magazine. Aping this style doesn't necessarily set out to sexualise Akira, but this is all the author sees; a woman in a seinen manga is only there for sexual gratification of the male audience. The author can't empathise with the audience or see them as anything but predators or potential sexual abusers. It's quite odd but also rather telling.

Bubblegum Crisis
Other articles are even more blatant in their exclusion of plot lines to force fit the narrative the author is trying to push. A piece on the differences between the original OVA and the latter TV series of “Bubblegum Crisis” has a narrative being pushed that the older OVA series presented the main cast as sexual objects and not as fleshed out characters. The only evidence presented for this is two quick cuts of animation in the opening sequence where Priss is changing into her stage outfit in the first OVA episode. For anyone who has seen the original OVA series, it’s quite a curious claim to make. It’s as if the author has conveniently forgotten what Priss does in the rest of the episode. The author also makes the absurd claim that she does not understand what the Knight Sabers’ motivations were in the OVA series and stunningly suggests that maybe they were only interested in money. To anyone who has actually watched the OVA series and has a modicum of comprehension skills, this is a bizarre takeaway. So, in the world of “Bubblegum Crisis”, the evil multinational corporation Genom and their Boomers weren't much of an issue then?

Some articles have premises so absurd you’d think they were satire. Take for example “Love & Lies: Case Closed and the normalization of gaslighting in fiction”, in which the author, with a straight face, suggests that “Detective Conan’s” titular character, Conan Edogawa, is gaslighting Ran Mori because he has to keep tricking her into thinking her boyfriend, Shinichi Kudo, is still away overseas when in fact Conan is Kudo and has been shrunk to the size of a small boy by an experimental drug. See, I told you the premise of the article was absurd. Now it’s hard not to admit some of the writing and situations in “Detective Conan” are silly beyond belief, but one can only assume the author is completely unfamiliar with how fiction is constructed and presented to an audience, especially in long running franchises like this one where the “reset button” technique is used at the end of each episode in order maintain the status quo of the setting and characters.

Detective Conan
The claim of gaslighting implies that Shinichi Kudo/Conan Edogawa is an abuser in his relationship with Ran Mori, which is absurd. It’s patently obvious that is not what Shinichi/Conan is trying to do. To seriously try to link the concept of gaslighting to a franchise running for over a quarter of century about a teenager stuck in the body of child who solves crime while riding a turbo powered skateboard just boggles the mind. Will there be another article written about the series concerning Conan’s highly dangerous practice of continually knocking Detective Kogoro Mori unconscious and impersonating his voice to announce he has solved a case? Surely this would cause Kogoro long term cognitive issues? But seriously, an absurd article like this really trivialises serious issues in regards to domestic abuse, like gaslighting and other forms of abuse in relationships.

Another issue I have with the writing is constant outdated stereotypes, myths and straight up othering of sub-fandoms. In the past Cook and the website have not been not been too complementary to fandoms centring around moe and idol fans and have suggested that sexist media creates “harassers”, which has no scientific basis in reality. In a response to what can only be described as an actual harasser on twitter, Anifem’s account stated “We never made any statements about the people watching the show. The stories someone enjoys are not indicative of their personal moral character and we've never stated otherwise. We analyze and critique fiction, not the fans of that fiction”. This statement is patently and demonstrably false.

Why was this particular screenshot of a Momoiro Clover Z
concert used to illustrate the idol culture article I wonder?
For example, hilariously in Vrai Kaiser’s debut episode review of “AMAIM Warrior at the Borderline”, she states “My goal is absolutely not to tell anyone not to watch AMAIM, or that they’re a bad person if they like the well-executed cool robot fights”, immediately after describing fans who liked “Darling in the Franxx” as “chuds” (“Franxx” truly is their bête noire, isn’t it?). Another earlier piece on idol fandom, “A Wedding Gown for “Their” Idol: Love Live, male audiences, and idol culture” trots out the usual clichés about idol fandom and men, dredging up the same couple of negative scandals the usual crowd bring up when criticising the industry. With a predictably you could set your watch by, the story of former AKB48 member Minami Minegishi shaving head bald for forgiveness after the public found out she had a boyfriend, was wheeled out yet again for the umpteenth time.

Reading the article, you get the impression that women do not exist in idol fandom, that the insanely popular boy bands on Johnny & Associates’ roster don’t exist, acts like Ladybeard, anti-idol groups BiS/BiSH apparently don’t exist, and the explosion of alternative idols in the last decade apparently was a figment of people’s imaginations. You would also believe that female “Love Live!” fans were non-existent too. Yet again, we see the exclusion of inconvenient truths and realities in order to force fit the narrative the author is trying to push. Even if they don’t explicitly criticise fans of certain anime or genres, they do enough dog whistling to appeal to the prejudices of their readers. And the dogs bark back. Sure, a second excellent, far more balanced article on female participation idol fandom was published several months down the track, however it was too little, too late in my opinion.

Otaku no Video
I really don't see how articles like this are helpful to fandom at all. Why stick up a strawman to bash away at? Why continue to perpetuate easily disprovable stereotypes and myths about certain fandoms and sub-fandoms? Why ignore how fandom actually interacts with the material they consume? Why claim on numerous occasions that any depictions of military action in anime are propaganda, not the fact that otaku just love military hardware? Of course, the “why” is to perpetuate an “us and them” mentality. Their thinking can be summed up as; those who watch and read material we deem repugnant (and have a very limited knowledge or understanding of) are “the enemy” and therefore we prejudge them as not sharing our beliefs or values (without having real evidence of course). Imagine having such a blinkered, Manichean view of the world and “othering” fandoms in this way.

I could go on and on, bringing up dozens more examples where you could only conclude authors deliberately misinterpreted storylines to fit narratives they were trying to push, ignored positive elements in manga and anime to dwell in mindless negativity, and perpetuating false and negative stereotypes of fandoms they took issue with. Instead, I want to bring up the elephant in the room; where does the website and the main staff sit in terms of their feminism? I think a lot of their views do sit comfortably in a moderate, mainstream type of feminism. However, it’s patiently clear that when dealing with themes of expressions of sexuality, it is really hard not to label a lot of the published views as sex-negative with some views heading into radical feminist territory.

In a winter 2018 summary of anime series for that season, Vrai Kaiser bizarrely described the pinkish knees on the female characters in “Citrus” as “blowjob knees”. In another recent seasonal review, Vrai again implied another set of female characters which also had the same feature and again that apparently meant they were also fellatio aficionados. I’m really not sure if Vrai has some issue with fellatio, but I do find it rather telling that she will on occasion bring this up in relation to female characters. Recently a reader rightly criticised Vrai’s specific, odd, prejudicial language in terms of female anime characters that have pinkish knees. With this complaint being from one of the “core demographic” and therefore they could not dismiss it as an “attack” as they normally do, they apologised, removed the offending language from the review and said it was a joke. It was patiently obvious it was not.

Anifem’s moralism around sexual expression and fantasy does not stop with female characters. It applies to fandom and more broadly, women. Caitlin Moore’s article on the manga “Horimiya”, BDSM and potential abuse in relationships starts out with her berating her own mother for defending “50 Shades of Grey”. Moore then trots out the old, thoroughly debunked Media Effects model, by suggesting that young people develop their ideas about relationships from fictional media, not from their close family and the communities they live in (yes, even in ones where sex education is non-existent). Putting that aside, it does feel odd to dump sex and relationship education on to fiction and criticise it for doing “a bad job” of it, when in reality the issue is clearly poor and/or inadequate or even non-existent sex education polices of governments and schools.

At any rate, it all reeks of a Mary Whitehouse mindset where fiction must change or fit their narrow, myopic morals and ethics in order to pass muster in their eyes. And it does feel similar to the techniques and language Christian fundamentalists like Whitehouse used (and continue to use), especially when shonen manga and anime titles are being criticised. Wrapping it up in progressive language does not make it less authoritarian than when Whitehouse or her contemporaries did it.

When I was involved in campaigns to stop the Australian internet being filtered more than 15 years ago, I would often come across far right Christian groups masquerading as feminist groups. One of their side issues was that of female pop singers sexualising themselves. These groups would often complain about the overt sexuality of Lady Gaga, Rihanna et al. The main argument was that the complainers could not find any female singer who wasn't “sexualised”. But then I would counter with a list of female singers who weren't; Polly Harvey, Florence Welch, Missy Higgins, Sarah Blasko, Kim Deal etc. And then they'd go silent. As you can see, the issue wasn’t that they wanted artists who weren’t “sexualised”, they wanted Lady Gaga and Rihanna not to be sexual. And there was their agenda laid bare; they did not really care about finding media or singers that were to their liking. They wanted to change stuff they didn't like. And I highly suspect this is mindset of Anifem as well.

Naoko Yamada
One of the issues with Anifem constantly highlighting negative aspects of Japanese pop culture, without reasonably highlighting the positive aspects of it, is they give the impression to those unfamiliar with it that as whole it is hostile to women and has little to offer them. This is of course untrue. I have already highlighted the fact that instead of writing an article on the amount of fantastic female directors making waves in the industry in the last decade or so, they went the negative route with an article about what keeps them out of directing positions. I’m not denying that the industry isn’t sexist or discriminatory (it most certainly is), but it’s unfair to ignore female talent in the industry and only tell one side of the story, especially when your website is about women and anime.

And if they are interested in women and anime as they claim, why are there no articles on women in fandom? Why is there nothing about the large female fandoms for franchises such as the original “Gundam” TV series and “Saint Seiya” for example? Why is there nothing about how female artists totally dominate Comic Market (Comiket) every year and have done so since its inception in 1975? Of course, anytime anyone asks any of the key staff why there isn't any articles like these, the answer is always the same; send in a pitch. Meaning, we the readers have to do the work for them. Seeing as they are always crying a poor mouth and asking for donations to fund their website and writers, why can’t they instead put some of that money towards searching out and commissioning people to do research and write articles about women and anime?

Large group of female fans trading badges in the
rain at Naka-Ikebukuro Park, photographed by myself,
circa Autumn 2013
For example; why not fund articles for subjects like trailblazing female mangaka and their titles? Or the history of early female centric fandoms in Japan? What about crushing stereotypes about doujinshi and talk about how women dominate that industry, especially when it comes to Comiket? How about an article on Otome Road, the female centric anime shopping district in Ikebukuro? Or perhaps, shock horror, anime and manga titles that their audience have never heard of before and might actually like? Who cares if this stuff isn’t commercially available in English? People are not going to know about it if someone doesn’t highlight it.

But of course, they aren’t doing any of this stuff. In fact, no one really is, and it can be extremely difficult to find articles or information about any of these things, especially in English. But that’s my point; why on earth would you create a website dedicated to women and anime (even if it has an ideological bent) and not really explore the topic? How is reviewing seasonal anime like the latest titty-filled fanservice show that your readers would not watch in a million years helpful to anyone at all? Unless your point is to feel morally superior because you’re so sophisticated that’d you’d never watch that “trash”? They also seem to have the condescending attitude that anime fans are uncritical of what they watch and consume. If don't agree that whatever this new season's “controversial” show is awful (usually some trashy exploitation or genre anime), then you're the problem, not them.

Top notch writing
And that’s the attitude that comes across. It's all very much "this is my experience, my unwavering, set-in stone philosophy on this subject, therefore every woman feels this way", which is utter bullshit. Oh, but don’t you dare criticise them. They really don't take any criticism well, regardless of how mild it is. All valid criticism is ignored, dismissed and placed the same pile as the right wing, anti-feminist abusive stuff. That is unless you fit certain criteria (I’ll leave you to guess what that is). Then they are suddenly very empathetic to your complaints.

I honestly could not imagine viewing all the media you consumed through the myopic lens of a rigid ideology. Imagine how tiring and tedious that would be. You can enjoy "problematic" material and still be a well-rounded, socially progressive person. It's not that hard. Humans are more than their personal beliefs, ethics and morals, and to a large degree people’s media choices do not have to comply 100% to their own personal beliefs, ethics and morals. For example, someone may enjoy the crime thrillers of Quentin Tarantino does not mean they subscribe to the ideals of his film’s protagonists. It would utterly absurd to suggest that fans of the TV show “Dexter” would empathise with and support serial killers. However, this is thought process seems to permeate through many of their articles and reviews throughout the website.

Just adding to the ridiculous existing moral panic about
anime and manga...
This is what drives me so batty about them. You have to ask why this sort of stuff is helpful to fandom as whole. Why review stuff that your core audience would just refuse to watch? Why even apply an ideology to any kind of entertainment in the first place? They and their supporters/readers also have no idea how fandom (especially Japanese fandom) interacts with media or why fandom even watch certain types of shows in the first place. Having suffered through various moral panics centred around music, horror films, pornography et al in the 1980’s and 1990’s, I thought we were long past this, but no. This lot pile on their blinkered, westernised interpretations on very Japanese pop culture. Mischaracterising this stuff isn’t useful in understanding it nor helpful to anyone trying to navigate the world of Japanese pop culture.

Five years of Anifem has brought us very little valid criticism. Mostly it's been a lot of hand wringing, tut-tutting, bolting on tired ideologies to the usual franchises where there are none, wretched, outdated views of what male fandom supposedly is and lots of gnashing of teeth. I really don’t understand the purpose of the site at times or understand why or how the writers became fans of anime and other Japanese pop culture. If you have so many issues with it and can’t reconcile your own personal ideology with it, why on earth are you a fan?

Saturday, September 11, 2021

1989, The Year in Japanese Cinema: An Introduction

Chief Cabinet Secretary Keizo Obuchi
announces the Heisei era
I was recently watching a few films in my collection and happened to notice how many great films were released in the year 1989 in Japan. It was a very interesting year in Japanese entertainment as it was the last hurrah of the opulent bubble economy, right before the eventual crash. This ten part series will look at nine films released that year, from big budgeted anime epics, family films, low budget off the wall guerrilla filmmaking, the trend in ero guro (erotic grotesque), and a resurgence in both tokusatsu film making and yakuza cinema. While most retrospectives of any film era just dive straight into the films themselves, I thought it might be a better idea to look at the political and social landscape of Japan and more broadly the world beforehand to understand how these films where shaped and what kind of social environment they were being released into.

Japan was on the cusp of a new era, quite literally. In early January of that year, Emperor Showa (better known as to the public as Hirohito) eventually succumbed to a long, drawn-out battle with duodenal cancer. It was the end of the Showa era which began in 1926. With his son Akihito ascending to the throne the following day, this new era was declared to be Heisei era. Turbulent social issues and changes, and economic events dramatic reshaped society and the entertainment industry over the next decade and beyond.

Funeral of Emperor Showa (Hirohito)
If you’re around my age, you might remember 1989 as being quite a turbulent period full of change but also an era of hope. It was the year of a wave of revolutions sweeping the Eastern Bloc in Europe, with the eventual tearing down of the Berlin Wall in November. The Tiananmen Square protests in Beijing began which led to a horrifying massacre. F. W. de Klerk was elected as State President of South Africa, where he soon announced the scrapping of the Separate Amenities Act which would lead to the end of apartheid a few years later. The Soviet Union declared the end of Soviet–Afghan War with withdrawal of the troops. Exxon Valdez ran aground off Alaska and spilt 240,000 barrels of oil off the coast. The Supreme Leader of Iran issued a fatwa calling for the death of Salman Rushdie over the content of his novel “The Satanic Verses”. The first written proposal for the World Wide Web was announced as well as New Zealand, Japan and Australia being connected to the internet for the first time. And the first episode of “The Simpsons” aired in the United States.

Japan was no less turbulent than the rest of the world. As I previously wrote, Emperor Showa died on 7 January that year, ending the Showa era and ushering in the Heisei era. As it was widely known that the emperor was on his death bed, new year celebrations that year were rather solemn. In the wake of the emperor’s death, all Japanese TV stations, excluding educational channels, ran programs back-to-back focusing on the emperor and the images and history of the Showa era for three days. This led to a flood of people rushing to video rental stores to alleviate the boredom of these broadcasts.

1989 saw the introduction of a consumer tax on goods, with the Mazda Roadster, Nintendo’s Game Boy and Sony’s Handycam Hi8 becoming massive consumer good hits. The Yokohama Bay Bridge opened, Sony acquired Columbia Pictures, and the fertility rate dropped significantly from 1.66 per woman in the previous year to 1.57. Fashion became more casual and sportier with a look dubbed Shibuya Casual, which was favoured by private junior and senior high school students. Italian fashion became popular amongst adults, as well as brands like Ralph Lauren. The buzzwords that year were sexual harassment (the more things change…) and “Obatarian”, which was a popular manga series by Katsuhiko Hotta.

The year also famously marked the culmination of one of the most rapid economic growth spurts in Japanese history known colloquially as the bubble economy. The Bank of Japan kept interest rates low due to the rapidly rising yen, sparking an investment boom that drove Tokyo property values up 60 percent in a single year in the mid 1980’s. But by Christmas 1989, the Bank of Japan announced a major interest rate hike, with the Nikkei reaching a record high by the end of the year. Within a couple of years, the bubble had well and truly burst and the period of economic decline later dubbed the Lost Decade, had begun.

Osamu Tezuka's funeral
An insider trading scandal, called the Recruit scandal, had rocked the ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) the previous year. Investigations stretched into 1989 with the eventual resignation of several ministers and politicians in the LDP including Prime Minister Noboru Takeshita. The scandal was so widespread that leaders of the Komeito (formerly New Komeito Party), Democratic Party of Japan, and Japan Socialist Party were also found to be involved. This eventually led the LDP to be temporally ousted from government in 1993 via a coalition of parties, the only time they had not held power since 1955.

A month after the passing of the emperor, manga author Osamu Tezuka died of stomach cancer in a Tokyo hospital. As you probably already know, Tezuka had an amazing, prolific career writing and drawing over 700 volumes of manga, with more than 150,000 pages. His manga delved into many genres from children’s stories to darker adult orientated ones. He truly earned his God of Manga title. In addition to his manga output, you could also argue he single handled created the anime industry with the establishment of Mushi Production and export of anime TV series such as “Astroboy” and “Kimba the White Lion”. Supposedly his last words were; “I'm begging you, let me work!”, to a nurse who was attempting to take away his tools for drawing manga.

The 1980’s had brought juvenile delinquency into the public consciousness with stereotypical archetypes like the sukeban, “bancho” type gangs and bosozoku motorcycle gangs. While fictional depictions of these groups satirised them, there was still an underlying unease in the public consciousness around juvenile delinquency. A new type of delinquent developed in this era; “Teamers”. Like other juvenile delinquents before them, many of these Teamer gangs were involved in significant crime of one sort or another such as blackmail, theft, assault or even rape. However, two significant cases involving teenagers and young people turbo charged a moral panic in regards to juvenile crime.

In early 1989, the body of Junko Furuta was discovered inside a 55-gallon drum which was filled with concrete. The perpetrators were four senior high school boys who had kidnapped, tortured and raped Furuta during the previous 40 days. Already malnourished and severely injured from the abuse, she was then beaten and tortured by the boys who took out their frustrations on her after losing a game of mahjong. She eventually succumbed to her accumulated injuries, and the boys then dumped her body inside the drum and filled it with concrete. The shocking case became known as the “concrete-encased high school girl murder case” and easily ranked as the worst case of juvenile crime in post war Japan. The ring leader was eventually given a 20-year sentence, which was the second-highest sentence given in Japan before life imprisonment. The other three boys were given lesser sentences of four to seven years, which where were perceived to be quite lenient by most of the public, considering the seriousness of the crime.

Investigators escort Tsutomu Miyazaki
to the park where he was first arrested
While that crime was horrendous, another act of depravity caught the public’s imagination, possibly for all the wrong reasons. It caused a bizarre moral panic which tared a subculture, literally changed the media landscape and diverted police resources into harassing that subculture for years after. I am of course of referring to the serial murderer, necrophiliac, cannibal and paedophile, Tsutomu Miyazaki. I really don’t want delve into his crimes (I think my description of him explains enough), but in a nutshell, he kidnapped and murdered four prepubescent girls. The police case was so inept that Miyazaki was only caught after the father of what could have been his fifth victim discovered him photographing his naked daughter in a park.

Unlike the Junko Furuta case, the media became hyper focused on Miyazaki’s hobbies. In another case of police incompetence, somehow most of the media gained access to his room in the family house, reportedly before the police had a chance to search it. Pictures of his room and the contents inside, stacked to the ceiling, mostly manga and video tapes, were splashed on TV screens as well as newspaper and magazine pages for weeks. Judging from the articles I have seen, his horror movie collection was initially highlighted, with films like “Hellraiser” and “A Nightmare on Elm Street”, as well as “mondo films” like “Shocking Asia”. Several ero anime titles are also covered in the articles such as videos from the “Cream Lemon” series. When his apparent fixation on horror films became known, TV stations immediately stopped broadcasting them. The whole episode was so toxic that in years following, some Japanese horror productions were cancelled or retooled into other genres. It all seems a bit rich as the Japanese public seemed to have no issue with gory horror films previously. For example the notorious cannibal horror/exploitation film “Cannibal Holocaust” made over a billion yen at the box office in 1983.

Tabloid media coverage
Due to the amount of video tapes and manga in his room, the media decided to dub Miyazaki the “Otaku Killer”. Media commentators, sociologists and even some psychologists fuelled an obscene moral panic which labelled all kinds of otaku as murders and rapists in waiting. In part this angle was played up by police prosecutors themselves who thought it would help cement a conviction. It was later revealed Miyazaki occasionally took part in the biannual Comic Market (Comiket). This eventually led police to raid manga and doujinshi shops with led to hundreds of titles being seized, and over 70 artists and shop owners detained for questioning. Even printers of doujinshi were implicated. The following years saw increased censorship across many forms of media, a drastic drop in the participation rate of Comiket and the word “otaku” becoming synonymous with Miyazaki’s deprived crimes. In the decades following and after Miyazaki’s execution in the early 2000’s, it became known that some of the material photographed in the original media articles was deliberately staged to be taken out of context or worse, was allegedly brought in and planted by the media themselves. It has also been noted that Miyazaki's room pretty much looked liked, and contained media that most people his age consumed.

One of the most controversial books published in modern Japanese history, “The Japan That Can Say No” was released that year. Written by Sony co-founder and chairman Akio Morita and LDP Minister of Transport and future controversial governor of Tokyo, Shintaro Ishihara, the title refers to the Ishihara’s view that the Japanese government should not be a "yes man" to the United States. It criticised United States business practices and advocated for Japan to take a more assertive stance on various business and foreign affairs issues. While most of Morita’s commentary in the book was arguably measured and fairly reasonable, Ishihara came across as somewhat of a far-right wing exclusionist and nationalist. In the book Ishihara played up Japanese superiority, threaten to spill trade secrets to the Soviet Union as a bargaining tool against the US, suggested that the quality of American goods was low because the education level of those workers was low and the US dropped atomic bombs on Japan and not Germany due to racism, even though Germany had already surrendered by the time the weapons were completed. Morita distanced himself from the book when it was published in English in the early 1990’s.

The Japan That Can Say No
Foreshadowing what was to come in the mid 1990’s, Tsutsumi Sakamoto, a lawyer working on a class action lawsuit against doomsday cult Aum Shinrikyo, was murdered, along with his wife and child, by members of the cult. However due to the usual incompetence of Japanese police investigators, the connection and arrests of the cult members for the murders was not made until after the Tokyo subway sarin gas attack some six years later.

Finally, I want to have a look at what was popular in terms of pop culture at the time. Despite the claims that TV anime was supposedly in decline, some great TV series began their broadcast; “Idol Densetsu Eriko”, “Blue Blink”, “Ranma ½”, “Dragon Ball Z”, “Patlabor”, “Yawara!” and “Dragon Quest”. “Dash! Yonkuro” also aired. This show which was based around toy Mini 4WD racing car kits, created a boom amongst children and caused a spike in sales of Tamiya’s Mini 4WD car kit range.

Wink
In music, the influence of idols had begun to wane. Popular music program “The Best Ten” was cancelled after 11 years on air. Over the next few years other music programs would cease broadcasting, severely limiting record companies’ ability to promote idols to the general public. This era in decline in idol record sales becomes known as the “Idol Ice Age”. However, even by 1989, changes were apparent with pop rock band Princess Princess having the two highest selling singles that year. Although idol duo Wink also had three singles in the top 10, all of which sold in excess of 500,000 copies each. As for western artists, the Cure’s “Lovesong” was massive hit. Other popular western artists included Bon Jovi and Madonna, but while the latter’s album “Like a Prayer” was the highest selling western album that year, it only placed as the 25th highest selling album in 1989.

In cinema, Hollywood still dominated with “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade” beating all comers in the yearly box office figures. However not far behind were two anime features, the highest grossing Japanese films of that year; “Kiki's Delivery Service” and “Doraemon: Nobita and the Birth of Japan”.

Highest Selling Singles of 1989
1. "Diamonds" - performed by Princess Princess
2. "Sekai de Ichiban Atsui Natsu" - performed by Princess Princess
3. "Tonbo" - performed by Nagabuchi Tsuyoshi
4. "Taiyou ga Ippai" - performed by Hikaru Genji
5. "Ai ga Tomaranai ~Turn It into Love~" - performed by Wink
6. "Koi Hitoyo" - performed by Kudo Shizuka
7. "Samishii Nettaigyo" - performed by Wink
8. "Arashi no Sugao" - performed by Kudo Shizuka
9. "Kousa ni Fukarete" - performed by Kudo Shizuka
10. "Namida wo Misenaide ~Boys Don't Cry~" - performed by Wink

Highest Grossing Movies of 1989
1. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
2. Rain Man
3. Kiki's Delivery Service
4. Doraemon: Nobita and the Birth of Japan
5. Cocktail
6. Who Framed Roger Rabbit
7. Orugoru
8. Black Rain (US film, not to be confused with Japanese film of same name, released in the same year)
9. Rikyu
10. Tora-san's Salad-Day Memorial

And that concludes my introduction to the era these films were released into. The current plan is to at least post one film review each month. But of course, things like life might get in the way, and you know what I’m like!

Saturday, July 3, 2021

The Status of this Blog and the Forever Delayed Revamped Anime Archivist Project

So, it’s probably time yet again to update you all on my forever delayed revamping of my Anime Archivist blog. I have thought long and hard about this, and have decided to abandon the project. As you might have noticed, not a lot of writing and publishing is getting done. Most of it over the last year and bit has been reviews of theatrical anime release and my look back at the previous decade in the trends in the anime industry. As I have previously noted, a number of people are doing similar things to what I was doing with the Anime Archivist, and I see no need for duplication.

However, most of the material other people write about focuses on the Japanese side of things and very few blogs or other fan made material focuses on English language video releases, fandom (which is almost entirely about US fandom), obscurities like commercial anime music video compilations or English language anime magazines. There are other things I want to write about as well such as the anime films of Japanese cult Happy Science (aka Kofuku-no-Kagaku) and my trips to Japan visiting otaku type sites and more mainstream areas of interest I have visited.

I also want to write about other topics which interest me, some of which will be totally unrelated to Japanese pop culture. Some of these will intersect with Japanese pop culture, some won’t. After finally finishing my series on the utter obscure UK anime video label Western Connection, I want to do another series of posts on a specific topic. However, it won’t be the Happy Science anime films series. I plan doing that one much later. I have already done a quite a bit of research and prep on this new series.

As I said previously, I still want to revisit material previously published on my long defunct Lost World of Anime website and blog (circa 2003 to 2010). The idea is for most, if not all of that material to be rewritten and republished on this blog. I also have other half-finished material which I may revisit, rewrite and publish. I also want write new posts based on the same format (reviews of lost or obscure English adaptations of anime and tokusatsu, plus English language anime magazines).

As I have said many times before, I'm not really concerned if I don't have a large following or no following at all for my writing. I'm just happy to write about this stuff. Due the stresses of work and life in general (but mostly work…), don’t expect regular posts. I will endeavour to post material on a more regular basis though.

Saturday, June 26, 2021

The Obscurities in the Western Connection Catalogue: “Ladius”

Release Date:
30 April 1995
Format: PAL VHS, Japanese Dialogue with English Subtitles
Runtime: 48 mins
Catalogue Number: WEST042
Japanese Title: Makyo Gaiden Le Deus (Demon Frontier Legend Le Deus)
Japanese Production Date: 1987

I originally started this series on the utterly odd and obscure 1990’s UK based video distributor, Western Connection, back in February 2014 on another now defunct blog. It has been over two and half years since I wrote and completed the previous part of the series. Due to numerous issues, a fair part of it due to my own laziness, here we are, finally at the end. But before we start exploring one of the last titles the company released, I thought a recap would be in order (the original updated post can be found here); Western Connection was easily the oddball out of all anime companies based in the UK. Formed in 1992, it was pretty much a one-man company run by Yugoslavian immigrant Sasha Cipkalo, with initial releases being an utterly eclectic range of mostly foreign language films as well as select titles aimed at the gay market. In 1993, somehow Cipkalo got the rights to an obscure, arty period piece anime called “The Sensualist”. This was an anime based upon a 17th century Edo era book, so it wasn’t exactly the most commercial title on the market.

The early to mid 1990’s was of course the era of “Manga Videos” in the UK, with some of the bigger selling VHS tapes selling in the tens of thousands. Even smaller titles averaged over 4,000 copies per tape. Unwittingly Cipkalo had become a player in this market and was utterly surprised when “The Sensualist” had become his biggest seller to date. Realising he had to act fast to capitalise on the anime trend, but having little idea what the market wanted, Cipkalo bought up relatively cheap licences, mostly from Toho and sublicenses from French company Ucore. As result, over half the titles in their anime catalogue were never released by any other company in English and were so obscure or niche, they were never reissued in Japan after their initial home video releases. While arguably most of these anime titles weren’t exactly stellar by anyone’s definition, the vast majority of them were quite interesting and entertaining. Today I will be looking at one of their final releases; “Ladius”.

Seemingly set on a post-apocalyptic Earth, some several hundred years in the future, we are introduced to a young man named Riot and his two female companions, Spica and Seneca, who are traveling during the night on their oddly designed mechanical transport. The group have obtained a type of lens which is part of a collection of five known as the Eye of Zalem. Riot is in search of all five of these "lenses", which will give him the power of Rido. Long ago a race known as the Quall hid away this power that could bring people back to life or cause death and destruction. But before they can travel to their next destination, Zalem, Rido informs his companions that will need to make a detour to the city of Zigoa. The next morning in the Shirale Valley at the house of a descendent of Zalem, a group of cyborgs collectively known as Demsters rough up the elderly occupant named Randal and his son to discover who they gave their lens to. After Randal's son succumbs to their violence and tells them they gave the lens to Riot, the Demsters kills both of them and then set out to find Riot.

Riot and the two girls arrive in Zigoa to meet a young woman called Yuta La Caradeen in the local bazaar who works as a kind of soothsayer. Riot hands Yuta a letter in which Randal asks her to give him the lens, warning that possession of it only brings despair. Initially she is no mood to deal with Riot, but before any negotiation can begin, the Demsters attack her and Riot’s group, but eventual end up destroying most of her possessions much to Yuta's annoyance. Spica and Seneca manage to get the Demsters to retreat after letting off smoke bomb-like weapons called Hiss Candy. Yuta is furious at Riot as her shop is putterly destroyed, so she presents him with a bill for the damage. Riot tries to smooth out things by saying that if she lets him take the Eye of Zalem, she will be rich once he finds Rido. She makes a deal with him; he can have the lens, but only if she can travel with him to the ruins of Zalem.

Having been defeated, the Demsters return to their leader, Kaiser. Annoyed at their failure, he sends them out to capture both the lenes and curiously Yuta. Kaiser believes she may be a link to Zalem. Meanwhile Riot and Yuta and his two companions are traveling through the countryside to the ruins of Zalem. The two girls give her a Jingu nut to eat, which she finds rather unpalatable. Later at stop off at a beach, where Riot hears the story of Yuta eating the Jingu nut and laughs. He explains that Spica and Seneca are artificial life forms called Plana who were created specifically to be partners for him. Jingu nuts are food they can only eat and aren’t really for humans. The group decides to camp for the night. Over a campfire Riot explains to Yuta that he wants the power of Rido in order to save his sister who is currently in a state of suspended animation after a vehicle accident.

The following day they finally arrive at the ruins of Zalem which is next to a large lake. While searching for the entrance, the group are attacked by the Demsters, this time in giant robots. They grab Yuta, hold her hostage and demand Riot give them the lenses in exchange for her safe return. Riot feels he has no choice in the matter and decides to give them the lenes he has in his possession. Predictably the Demsters renege on the deal and once they have the lenses in their hands. They fire missiles at Riot, leave him for dead and head back into the lake from where they came. Luckily Riot and the girls are unharmed by the attack and head into the water in their transport in order to rescue Yuta. Initially they have no idea how to find her, but then Riot remembers that she ate part of a Jingu nut, and the trace elements within it are trackable on their scanners.

Meanwhile in the at the entrance to Zalem temple which is located in a large cavern under the lake, the Demsters hand over Yuta and the lenses to Kaiser. Kaiser attempts to enters the temple after placing all of the lenses in place on an altar. But he soon discovers that he cannot enter the temple and realises that only a descendent of Quall people can release the seal on the entrance to the temple. He commands that Yuta be brought to him and tells her, much to her surprise, that she is actually a descendent of a Zalem priest. She initially refuses his demands to open the temple, so he hypnotises her to make her navigate through the temple according to his will. However, Riot, Spica and Seneca finally arrive and are about to mount a rescue plan to save Yuta and foil Kaiser's plans.

This is another one of those one shot OVAs that were common from the mid to late the 1980’s right through to the late 1990’s when the format started to wane in favour of late-night anime TV series. To be utterly honest, this show is quite derivative; we have the rather cocky hero, the feisty female lead, two cute arse-kicking ditzy side-kicks, an evil white-haired villain, his ruthless cyborgs and giant robots. The plot can be equally derivative; baddies who need a lot of killing to be truly dead, clichéd and cheesy anime dialogue, and to top it off it's set in a quasi-post-apocalyptic/fantasy setting. Yet despite all of that, I really liked it. It's executed with quite a lot of style and flair. The creative staff knew they weren't making a masterpiece, so they've just gone for pure fun. And it delivers in spades. I mean yeah, its trashy in vernacular of how someone might describe 1980’s B-movie genre cinema, but it's quite entertaining trash. And the best thing about it is that it doesn't insult your intelligence.

Even though it is a bit of clichéfest, there are some original elements s to the OVA. For example, Riot’s bandage wrapped around his left arm can be unfurled and serves as both a weapon and a rope like tool to scale walls for example. Of course, the key element which makes this show so fun is the rather excellent animation, which for it’s time is just a notch above most OVAs. It’s really fluid, on model and really well done. The titular robot of this show, Ladius, who doesn't appear until the last 10 minutes of the show, is highly reminiscent of “Dangaioh”. However, none of the mecha designers who worked on that OVA worked on “Ladius”. As the first episode of “Dangaioh” was only released two months before “Ladius”, it’s highly unlikely the mecha designers were influenced by those designs. Of note is the Japanese promotional material which proclaims that Rei Aran of “Iczer 1” was the character designer. While this is true in a sense, Rei Aran was actually the mangaka for an adaption of “Iczer 1” that appeared in manga anthology magazine “Lemon People”, but he was not involved in the anime version. Furthermore Hideki Tamura (key animator and also character designer for “MADOX-01” and “Dream Dimension Hunter Fandora”) cleaned up Aran’s designs for the animation.

The director of this OVA was Hiroshi Negishi whose name should be familiar to fans of 1990’s anime. Some of his more famous creations include "Master of Mosquiton" and the "Saber Marionette" series ("Saber Marionette R", "J", "J to X"). He also directed "K.O. Century Beast Warriors", "Knights of Ramune & 40", "Misaki Chronicles", "Tekkaman Blade", "Sonic Soldier Borgman", "Burn Up W", "Shadow Skill" OVAs and "Amazing Nurse Nanako. Also on board for this OVA is screenplay writer Hideki Sonoda who has mostly done work on the "Pokémon" movies and TV series. Also working on the screenplay was Hiroyuki Kitakubo, who has had an amazing career. He helped with animation on "Urusei Yatsura" when he was only 15, was director on the first OVA in the infamous "Cream Lemon" series, and directed "Blood: the Last Vampire", "Roujin Z" and the "A Tale of Two Robots Chapter 3: Foreign Invasion" segment from "Robot Carnival".

The voice cast is quite good too with Kazuki Yao (Shinobu Fujiwara in “Dancouga”, Judau Ashta in “Gundam ZZ”, Franky in “One Piece”) as Riot, Yuko Mizutani (Leina Stol in “Machine Robo”, Mihoshi in “Tenchi Muyo!”, Pinoko in “Black Jack”) as Yuta, Norio Wakamoto (Shapiro Keats in “Dancouga”, Vicious in “Cowboy Bebop”, Charles Zi Britannia in “Code Geass”) as Kaiser, and Sho Hayami (Maximilian Jenius in “Macross”, Nicholas D. Wolfwood in “Trigun”) in a bit part as the mysterious leader of the Demsters. However, Seneca’s voice actor, Toshimi Nakamura, is pretty abysmal. Unsurprisingly this is her only credited role in an anime, and I cannot find any other information about her on the web. I sort of suspect this was Toshimi’s only real venture into the world of commercial Japanese entertainment.

Quality issues as per usual are a problem with this tape. Apart from the low-quality VHS tape used, as per the vast majority of Western Connection titles, subtitle timing is a major problem, though it’s not quite as bad as some of their other titles. The packaging only shows two small pictures on the back of the cover which are both of the robot Ladius, plus, as usual, a synopsis taken from the review of the OVA from UK anime magazine “Anime FX” (formerly “Anime UK”). But unlike other tape covers from the company, this time the magazine's work goes uncredited. I suspect that Western Connection and Anime UK had some sort of deal going on in terms of recycling reviews for their covers, as Jonathan Clements translated for both companies. Honestly though, I wouldn't be surprised if Western Connection didn’t just blatantly steal the text from the magazine. The cover uses the art from the original character designer Rei Aran which also appeared on the Japanese video releases, which is why Yuta looks quite different from the animation design. The nudity is in line with Aran’s primary work in “Lemon People”, which was an adult publication, although there is no nudity in the OVA itself.

If you’re huge fan of OVAs from this period, don’t hesitate to track down a copy of “Ladius”. This show was released when Western Connection was gasping its last breaths of air (in fact I believe it was the second to last anime title they released), and is pretty much impossible to find now. Unfortunately, this show never got a re-release on DVD or blu-ray in Japan or anywhere else in the world. Recently I have not been able to find copies on VHS, VHD or laserdisc on Yahoo! Auctions Japan. In fact, the rather nice soundtrack album, or in fact any other merchandise from the show, is now extraordinarily hard to find. The only readily available “Ladius” item seems to be the 1990's VHS release by Italian video company Yamato. Coupled with this is the lack of information on the web about the show, either in English or Japanese. I feel a lot of these old OVAs are just going to disappear and never be seen again. The OVA market created some weird and wonderful shows and some great experimentation that we don't see now days. A great deal of this older material never even made the leap to DVD let alone blu-ray and will never be re-issued. Sure, most of it isn't the pinnacle of anime, but it'd be nice to save some of these titles from obscurity.

And this wraps up my series on Western Connection. As I previously stated at the beginning of this series, after a final batch of releases from the company in mid 1995, nothing more was issued from the company thereafter. Late into 1995 and into 1996, the news sections of “Anime FX” magazine stated that new titles such as “Darkside Blues” and the remaining unreleased OVAs for “Hummingbirds” and “Devil Hunter Yohko” were due to be released in 1996. However, the months went by and not a peep was heard from Western Connection and they eventually faded from the minds of UK anime fandom. Finally, unfortunately this series will be ending on a sour note. I was contacted by someone in the UK who was working on a book and website dedicated to the history of UK anime releases. I found out from him that Western Connection owner, Sasha Cipkalo, was rather upset about what I had written about his company, which surprised me as these events and releases are from over a quarter of a century ago. In my opinion I thought I was quite mild and fair in my writings on the company and their products. I am deeply disappointed with Sasha’s take on my posts. This series was never a criticism of Sasha himself. I only ever meant to celebrate and highlight the delightfully odd anime titles he brought over for an English language audience to discover and experience.

Note: This post is based on previously published versions posted on the defunct “Lost World of Anime” website and blog in 2004 and 2009.

Saturday, June 12, 2021

Anime On the Big Screen: “Josee, the Tiger and the Fish”

Venue:
Hoyts Belconnen, Westfield Belconnen, Level 3, 18 Benjamin Way, Belconnen, ACT
Date: Thursday 10 June 2021
Distributor: Madman Entertainment
Format: Digital Projection, Japanese dialogue with English subtitles
Length: 98 minutes
Production Date: 2020
Currently on Home Video in English (as of writing): No

I know it’s been a long time since I have written anything. Work has been pretty relentless and I haven’t been feeling all that motivated to write really. I’ve made few aborted attempts to write, but nothing has been finished or is worth publishing. Also there haven’t been many anime films coming to cinemas either. This particular film was originally slated to screen in April but was delayed two months for unknown reasons. I noticed Hoyts in Belconnen was screening it, so I decided for a change of pace to go there instead of visiting Dendy in the city. After a quick bite to eat, I headed into the 6:20pm session, but soon discovered I was literally the only one in the cinema! Luckily two young blokes came in during the opening title sequence so I ended up having some company. I just can’t believe Hoyts is making any money off these screenings. Anyway, let’s talk about the film;

Tsuneo Suzukawa, a man in his early twenties, is working part time in a scuba diving shop/café in Osaka. He is utterly obsessed with diving and hopes to study overseas in Mexico in order to continue that passion. As a result, Tsuneo lives a frugal life as he saves every yen he can for his future studies. His work colleague, Hayato Matsuura, constantly berates him for not living in the moment having more fun at his age. His other work colleague, Mai Ninomiya, secretly has a crush on Tsuneo, but seemingly can’t work up the courage to ask him out, even though the young trio often go diving together and out drinking after work.

Walking home after work in the early evening, Tsuneo sees a young woman in a wheelchair hurtle uncontrollably down the slope of hill. Though he tries to stop her, she is flung put of her wheelchair and he accidently ends up breaking her fall and both end up on the ground. Her grandmother eventually catches up with her and thanks Tsuneo for saving her. The grandmother states that someone pushed her granddaughter downhill while she was distracted. The granddaughter is not all impressed with the situation and calls Tsuneo, who is still slightly in shock, as pervert for still clinging on to her. The grandmother decides that after this incident there will be no more walks for a long time as the world is a scary place that could hurt her. The granddaughter is of course upset with this.

Calling it a day, the pair walk home with Tsuneo unintentionally flowing them as they are heading in the same direction as his apartment. This of course does not impress the granddaughter who has seemingly taken a great dislike to him. Arriving at the front door of their house, the grandmother invites him in for dinner, which as a cash strapped student he gleefully accepts. The grandmother introduces herself as Chizu Yamamura and her granddaughter as Kumiko Yamamura, though she corrects her and proclaims her real name to be Josee. Josee's parents had died when she was young and her grandmother took her in as she did not want her to be put in an institution. Although Josee seems to despise him Chizu suggests in order to make more money for his overseas studies he should work as a caretaker for Josee while she is away from the house. Although initially reluctant, he decides to take on the job. Chizu only has two rules; Josee cannot leave the house and he must do whatever Josee tells him to do.

Things don’t go well. Josee ends up holed up insider her bedroom, ignoring him and either reads most the time or tells him to go home. When she does speak to him, she orders him to do absurd duties such as counting the threads in a tatami mat or collecting four leaf clovers for her. He later complains to his colleagues when they go out drinking. They eventually suggest to him that maybe the money isn’t really worth the pain of looking after Josee and maybe he should quit. When he later shows up at the house to tell them that he is quitting, he discovers no one seems to be at home. He goes into her room to look for her and is astonished to see her artwork of the ocean. Tsuneo is later informed by Chizu that Josee has gone missing. He searches everywhere for and eventually finds her. She states she wants to go the ocean as she has never been there. Feeling sorry for her being cooped up in the house all the time, he eventually relents and takes her there, even though she has a couple of bad experiences with people at the train station.

She has always wanted to see if the sea really tasted salty as her deceased father once told her. Though she insists crawling to the water’s edge, Tsuneo picks her up and caries her as he walks into the surf. Water splashes on her face and she tastes the salt and begins to laugh. After this unplanned excursion, Tsuneo and Josee take trips out into the city every day, and she experiences things she has never done before, which improves her outlook on life, even if Chizu doesn’t want her to go out at all. The pair go to the aquarium where they see a Clarion Angel fish. Tsuneo explains he saw this fish at a pet store when he was young and his dream is to see it in person off the coast of Mexico. A trip to the library brings a chance encounter and a new friendship with a young librarian named Kana Kishimoto. Though Josee is a little stand offish, the two bond over their love of the works of Françoise Sagan, and we discover that the name Josee is actually a character from one of Sagan's novels.

However, a trip to Tsuneo’s workplace doesn’t go well, with Josee, who has developed a crush on Tsuneo, becoming jealous when Mai discusses a workplace matter with him. She proclaims that she wants to leave and she has a fight with Tsuneo with leads her to abruptly leave in huff and return to her house by herself. Tsuneo later receives a call from Chizu advising his services are no longer required. He is utterly confused and frustrated at the turn of events. He and Josee later reconcile, but Tsuneo has been accepted by a Mexican university and he will be heading over then in a few months’ time. However, two tragedies will change the course of both their lives forever.

This film is based on a short story published in 1984 by Seiko Tanabe who was best known for her romance and historical novels as well as her essays. It does seem odd that a short story from over thirty-five years ago would be given an anime adaptation now. I suspect the interest in this work was due to the fact Tanabe died in June 2019. “Josee, the Tiger and the Fish” is one of her more popular works. Oddly a Korean live action theatrical feature adaptation of the story, titled “Josée”, was also released in the same month as this film. I suspect this story is also popular in Korea as the anime film debuted at the 25th Busan International Film Festival two months before it’s Japanese theatrical release. This film does follow the plot of the book closely for the first half of the film as far as I can figure out, then diverges greatly for the second half of the film.

A second live action film adaptation released in 2003 also diverges greatly from the short story with Josee being wheeled around in a pram instead of a wheelchair and Tsuneo and Josee actually having sex in the film, something which most anime shy away from, which seems at odd with constant criticisms in some quarters against anime that it has too much sexual content. This adaptation was helmed by animation studio Bones with Kotaro Tamura, who has done little of note except “Noragami”, directing. Interestingly, Sayaka Kuwamura, who has only worked on live action dramas and films previously, was brought on as screenwriter, because the producer and director felt the original story was more like a live action film and the same type of screenwriting would suit it. Mangaka Nao Emoto (“O Maidens in Your Savage Season”) did the original character designs and Haruko Iizuka (“Little Busters!”, “Tamayura”, “School-Live!”) cleaned them up for animation. Rounding out the staff was Evan Call (“Violet Evergarden”) who scored the soundtrack.

For me, the film was a little bit on the average side. Despite the use of a screen writer from the live action film and drama world, it was filled with a lot of clichés and tropes you’d find in a typical romantic comedy of this type. Josee herself is a stereotypical Tsundere who bullies the heck out of Tsuneo. While I understand that he would want to keep the job looking after Josee, but you’d think he would put his foot down at some of her absurd requests right from the get go. Josee constantly belittles him by calling him the “caretaker”, though by the end of the film it becomes more of a playful nickname. The film also feels rather old fashioned, both in how disabled people are treated by the public and Tsuneo’s attitude to work. Neither feel true to modern day Japan or the values of modem Japanese, but perhaps this can be chalked up to the era the source material was written in. The eventual love triangle, which does rear its head by the half way mark, also feels terribly cliched and unoriginal.

But as the film progresses it does improve. The new material not present in the original story does change it for the better. Not wanting to give away spoilers, but the change in plot does put Tsuneo and Josee on an equal footing, especially after Josee accuses him of being ableist. One of the main themes of this film is of course Tsuneo coming into Josee’s life and exposing her the wonders of the outside world which Chizu tried to shield her away from. Stories of mermaids are used a metaphor for Josee’s dreams to be free of her disability and live a normal life. Early on there is an extraordinarily beautiful sequence where Josee dreams the world is flooded and she becomes a mermaid freely swimming though the city. Other parts of the film show that the world is still somewhat hostile to Josee and want to force her crashing down to what others consider "reality". She is told that it would not be realistic to be able to live by herself by making money off her art. This segues into the other major theme of the story is following your dreams regardless of whatever happens or what obstacles are put in your way.

Despite the setting of Osaka, there are few of the typical clichés and stereotypes associated with the city that you'd find in anime or other pop culture. None of the usual landmarks like the Tower of the Sun or Tsutenkaku Tower are present. The Glico running man sign in Dotonbori is mentioned once, but that’s it. Despite author Seiko Tanabe’s love of using Kansai dialect in her works (her birthplace was Osaka and she spent her childhood there), I could not hear it in the film. Then again, I’m not a native speaker. Adding to what I’ve said previously, another issue I had with the film was Chizu’s overly protective attitude to Josee, which could be seen as abusive. This is totally glossed over in the film. Some of the actions taken by Josee in the later part of the film lacked logic, or more accurately, explanation (it was very hard to understand what she was thinking or planning to do). But the animation is utterly gorgeous most of the time and I did like the shift in the story during the second half which really filled out Tsuneo’s character and made him even more empathetic to Josee’s plight.

Summing up, this is a decent romantic comedy, but is held back by a lot of tropes and clichés of the genre. Kuwamura’s screenplay may go over well with an audience used to these types of live action films that are made by (and let’s be honest) a completely insular Japanese film industry that doesn’t respect the audience enough to give them something slightly challenging. However, I think international audiences for anime are far more sophisticated than that. There is a reason pretty much no live action Japanese cinema reaches western cinemas now days. I really think I can only give this film 6 out of 10 on balance. As per most modern anime films, there is additional footage during the end credits and afterward, so don’t leave the cinema early.